Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Fritz's avatar

Thoughtful article from a thoughtful source.

Expand full comment
Swag Valance's avatar

A lot of this is older than you credit.

Nate's use of mechanical Turk-powered human back-ends is a trick that not only included Amazon's "just walk out" technology (https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2024/apr/10/amazon-ai-cashier-less-shops-humans-technology). Back in 2013 there was an angel and light VC rage over mobile apps that could scan photos and identify what is in it.

A kind of souped-up Hotdog/Not-Hotdog (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vIci3C4JkL0) for ecommerce. I had heard multiple insider stories of startup CEOs who hired armies of temp staff in India to view the submitted images, search the Internet, and message back their guesses.

And in FinTech specifically, credit card fraud detection has been run by AI/ML for at least a decade now. So AI has long been embedded within FinTech. The challenge is to pull back on Maslow's Hammer and appreciate context. Running a service that requires absolute precision or ethical nuance -- e.g., something that displays a balance or determines whether to award a customer a loan -- is very different from a generative one that leans into generative AI and suggests wedding anniversary gift ideas.

Hearing they're deploying only 10% of the AI capabilities honestly sounds too high. With AI, the costs of going from idea to implementation are plummeting. Building things is no longer the scarcity: it's the ideation, experimentation, and deliberate selection of the best ideas. Get any focus group together to come up with 10 ideas, and only 1 or 2 (~10-20%) are worth anything.

Vet those out further with deeper analysis, data validation, acceptance testing, and customer service training and the figure should be much lower.

Expand full comment

No posts