Your Optimism Is Killing Your Business (And So Is Your Pessimism)
The paradoxical thinking method that helped Intel survive – and how to use it in 5 minutes daily
Years ago, during a lunchtime meeting with a venture capitalist at the Singularity University campus on the NASA Ames Research Facility, right in the heart of Silicon Valley, my VC friend told me a story. In a previous life, a long time ago, he worked for Intel when Andy Grove was still at the helm of the company. He was in a meeting with the extended leadership team when a colleague burst into the room, jubilantly announcing that Intel’s stock price had just hit a massive milestone. The room erupted in celebration. Grove, meanwhile, sat at the head of the long conference table and didn’t say a word. When asked why he wasn’t celebrating (as a major shareholder, the news certainly made him a very rich man), he looked around and said, “With the market valuing us at what it is, we now need to live up to this valuation. We better get to work!” And so, the celebration ended, and the meeting (and work) continued.
I don’t know if this story is true, but it makes for a great tale, especially in today’s world where startups (particularly those even remotely related to AI) are valued at truly eye-watering amounts of money. It also reminds me of an old truism that seems pertinent, particularly in times of heightened uncertainty and ambiguity where everything appears to be up in the air:
You need short-term paranoia to keep you alive long enough to exploit long-term optimism.
Grove famously said something to this tune in his quip (and book of the same name), ”Only the paranoid survive.” But a mindset that can be paranoid and optimistic at the same time is hard to maintain, because seeing things in black and white takes less effort than accepting nuance.
Most people believe they need to pick a side – either they are the paranoid pessimist who sees every threat, or they are the visionary optimist who dreams big. This binary thinking creates paralysis. When times are uncertain, they freeze, unable to reconcile the need for immediate vigilance with long-term hope. They see these as opposing forces rather than complementary powers.
We call people who incorporate both optimism and paranoia “paradoxical thinkers.” They are not abandoning optimism for paranoia or vice versa. Studies on paradoxical thinking reveal that individuals who embrace contradictory ideas demonstrate higher cognitive flexibility and better problem-solving in complex environments. Research on integrative complexity – the ability to hold multiple perspectives simultaneously – shows it predicts superior decision quality in uncertain conditions.
Andy Grove didn’t celebrate or panic. He held both the achievement and the accountability in his mind at once. That’s not contradiction – it’s integration. You are becoming someone who can sprint and scan the horizon, who can build and question, who can commit and adapt.
Here is a simple, practical way how you can approach this:
Paranoia Check: Write down 3 threats or vulnerabilities you face. Be specific. What could go wrong? What are you not seeing?
Anticipation Vision: Write down 3 opportunities or long-term wins you are building toward. What is the future you are creating?
Calibration Question: Ask yourself: “What is one action today that serves both my short-term survival and my long-term vision?”
You need short-term paranoia to keep you alive long enough to exploit long-term optimism.
@Pascal


Not sure if it's true or not, but it is entirely believable. My best friend in SV from the 90s onward worked with the exec team at Intel in those years, and it was nothing like what passes for executive leadership today in Silicon Valley.
Grove was famously known to be the egalitarian who didn't hold a mahogany office but rather sat in a cubicle along with everyone else. I (somewhat cynically) questioned the merits of such an arrangement, especially when conversations involved details of a highly material nature (and not just as far as the SEC was concerned). But sure enough, when I visited their HQ, there he was... right in the open alongside everyone else.
I don't quite think they make CEOs like him anymore. Or perhaps more to the point, at least boards don't select CEOs like him anymore. Instead of escaping the Hungarian fascist dictatorship as he did, today's tech CEOs are more complicit advocates for recreating it.